Skip to content

The directory / Questions

Psychedelic retreat destinations compared: law, length, price and screening

123 centres in 8 places, compared on what the rows can show: the legal footing of the medicine, how long programmes run, what centres publish as a price, and how many describe medical screening. Legal footing is not a safety rating, and a listing is not an endorsement.

Figures computed from the directory's rows, read 28 Sep 2026. Every fact links to its source.

Side by side

PlaceMedicineFootingCentresMedian nightsMedian per nightDescribe screeningPublic record
JamaicaPsilocybinLegal65.5 (12)$1,049 (10)6 of 61
NetherlandsPsilocybin (truffles)Legal83.5 (10)EUR 875 (5)7 of 80
Oregon, USAPsilocybinLicensed21Not publishedNot publishedRegister0
Colorado, USAPsilocybinLicensed46Not publishedNot publishedRegister0
PeruAyahuascaLegal137 (11)$340 (9)11 of 132
Costa RicaAyahuascaTolerated136 (15)$614 (12)8 of 131
BrazilAyahuascaTolerated48 (3)$291 (2)0 of 40
MexicoIbogaineUnregulated127 (19)$1,460 (10)11 of 124

Figures in brackets are the number of published programmes behind each median. Per-night medians use whole-programme prices in the currency most programmes in that place are priced in. "Register" means the listings come from a state licence register, which does not record screening statements. Computed from the directory's rows, read 28 September 2026.

What each footing means

  • Jamaica: Legal

    Psilocybin mushrooms are not listed in Jamaica's Dangerous Drugs Act: unscheduled and unregulated, with no licensing regime.

  • Netherlands: Legal

    Fresh psilocybin truffles (sclerotia) are outside the Opium Act; mushrooms, fresh or dried, have been banned since December 2008.

  • Oregon, USA: Licensed

    State-licensed psilocybin services under ORS 475A (Measure 109), for adults 21 and over.

  • Colorado, USA: Licensed

    Licensed healing centres under the Natural Medicine Health Act, for adults 21 and over.

  • Peru: Legal

    Traditional ayahuasca use is protected as national cultural heritage; there is no licensing regime for retreats.

  • Costa Rica: Tolerated

    Ayahuasca is not named in Costa Rica's drug law but is not authorised either: tolerated in practice, and the subject of a January 2025 Health Ministry warning.

  • Brazil: Tolerated

    Religious use of ayahuasca is permitted; paid retreats for visitors sit in a legal grey area under CONAD Resolution 1/2010.

  • Mexico: Unregulated

    Ibogaine is not listed in Mexico's General Health Law: unregulated, not approved.

Not on this list

Peyote ceremonies are not listed anywhere on this site. Wild peyote is under conservation pressure and is the sacrament of the Native American Church, and Colorado's natural medicine law excluded it by name. Nor are psilocybin or peyote centres in Mexico, where both are scheduled, or psilocybin mushroom retreats in the Netherlands.

Questions and answers

Where are psychedelic retreats legal?
It depends on the medicine and the word "legal". Lawful: Jamaica (psilocybin), Netherlands (fresh psilocybin truffles), Peru (ayahuasca). State-licensed: Oregon, USA (psilocybin), Colorado, USA (psilocybin). Unregulated rather than approved: Mexico (ibogaine). Tolerated but not authorised: Costa Rica (ayahuasca), Brazil (ayahuasca). Each footing is sourced to a statute, regulator or court on the location page.
Which place has the most listed retreat centres?
Colorado, USA, with 46 of the 123 centres listed on 28 September 2026. They come from the state licence register.
Where are published retreat prices lowest per night?
Among places with at least three US-dollar programmes that publish a night count, Peru has the lowest median at $340 per night (9 programmes, ayahuasca) and Mexico the highest at $1,460 (10 programmes, ibogaine). Different medicines involve very different levels of medical care, so a per-night figure compares price, not value.
Do retreat centres say they screen guests medically?
Most do, but not all. Centres describing a medical screening process on their own sites, as read on 28 September 2026: Jamaica 6 of 6, Mexico 11 of 12, Netherlands 7 of 8, Peru 11 of 13, Costa Rica 8 of 13, Brazil 0 of 4. Oregon and Colorado are left out because their listings come from the state registers, where screening is set by state rules.
Do any listed centres have a public record?
8 do, in Jamaica (1), Peru (2), Costa Rica (1), Mexico (4). Each profile shows the dated, sourced entries (reported deaths, regulator actions, legal cases or allegations) and the centre's response where one was published. Those centres are never given paid placement.

The dispatch

Laws change. Centres change. Know before you book.

A brief, sent only in weeks when something changes: jurisdictions that shifted, listings added or revised, and the research worth reading. No hype, no sourcing talk.

Educational only. Not medical advice. Unsubscribe any time.